Ruby constants have weird behavior in class_eval
I was playing with some code the other day, and I noticed that constants work strangely in class_eval blocks. Sometimes it can find the constant, and sometimes it cannot.
For example, say we have a class with a constant:
class Foo
CONS = 'const'
end
Now, if we reopen the class and print the constant, it works as expected:
>> class Foo
>> puts CONS
>> end
const
However, if we use a class_eval instead of reopening the class, ruby cannot find the constant:
>> Foo.class_eval { puts CONS }
NameError: uninitialized constant CONS
from (irb):12
from (irb):11:in `class_eval'
from (irb):11
It gets even stranger. We can still see the constant in the list of constants:
>> Foo.class_eval { puts self.constants }
CONS
Furthermore, a const_get still works:
>> Foo.class_eval { puts const_get(:CONS) }
const
Finally, if we try the class_eval again with a string instead of a block, it works:
>> Foo.class_eval "puts CONS"
const
Apparently, constants have a problem with blocks inside of class_eval.
4 comments
Comments
-
I think this is a feature. Every block is scoped to the environment where it is created. So the constant is searched in the outer scope. This allows you to do things with class_eval that use variables outside of the class itself as parameters. To make it more catchy:
CONS = 'outer_const' class Foo CONS = 'inner_const' end Foo.class_eval { puts CONS } #=> "outer_const" 1.times { puts CONS } #=> "outer_const"Would be strange if CONS would be searched within Fixnum. -
This is not really a feature as schmidt suggests. Rather, it's an artifact of the way Ruby's parsing works. Basically, a "real" constant reference will have it's cref set during parse time - meaning it will be resolved using real lexical scope. The difference here is that when you list all constants in a scope or use const_get, you're really using the dynamic scope, which makes a huge difference within class_eval/module_eval/instance_eval. Hope that cleared things up. It's not really a feature, and not necessarily a bug; just quirky behavior.
-
Thanks, Ola. Very interesting.
-
This could be explained as closures work in Ruby.